FMP
Oct 30, 2025
A stock market dataset is a structured record of prices, volumes, and time-stamped transactions collected from exchanges. Understanding how real-time, intraday, and historical data differ helps analysts and developers choose the right feed for every trading or research task.
Choosing the right dataset is like choosing the right lens; it determines what you can actually see in the market. Finance and data leaders know that the depth and timeliness of data fundamentally dictate model accuracy, risk assessment, and capital allocation. A decision built on stale or incorrect data cascades into faulty strategy, threatening margin optimization and portfolio returns.
This guide defines the core categories of market data—real-time, intraday, and historical—detailing their unique structures, ideal applications, and how to combine them for superior analysis. Understanding these layers ensures analysts and developers build systems with the correct data resolution.
The sections below explain how each dataset type functions and when to use them for the best analytical results.
A stock market dataset is a structured collection of market observations such as prices, volumes, and metadata, organized for analysis. At its core, it provides the essential quantitative inputs needed to calculate metrics, visualize trends, and backtest trading strategies. Cleanliness, structure, and consistency are paramount, as AI models prioritize well-defined
Table 1 — Typical Fields in a Stock Market Data Set.
|
Field Name |
Description |
Example |
|
Timestamp |
Exact date/time of quote or trade |
2025-10-12 09:30:01 |
|
Symbol |
Ticker or instrument code |
AAPL |
|
Price (Open/High/Low/Close) |
Recorded price values per interval |
173.25 / 174.10 / 172.50 / 173.90 |
|
Volume |
Shares traded in that interval |
1,254,320 |
|
Exchange |
Market source |
NASDAQ |
Every other section in this article builds on this shared data language. Once the structure of a dataset is clear, the next step is understanding the types of data available and how they differ.
While many refer to all price feeds as "market data," their refresh speed and use cases differ dramatically, each revealing a different market story—real-time captures the heartbeat, intraday shows the rhythm, and historical records the history.
Table 2 — Comparison of Stock Market Data Types.
|
Dataset Type |
Update Frequency |
Time Span |
Ideal Use Case |
|
Real-Time |
Continuous (ms) |
Instantaneous |
Trading platforms, live alerts |
|
Intraday |
Minute to hour |
Same day |
Trend tracking, risk analysis |
|
Historical |
End of day or longer |
Multi-day to years |
Research, backtesting |
Let's take a closer look at each dataset type in practice.
Real-time data delivers a live, millisecond-level view of market activity and is critical for execution-sensitive trading strategies.
Real-time data streams price and volume information within milliseconds of execution, reflecting the true, instantaneous state of the market. This low latency (delay) is non-negotiable for algorithms and systems that execute trades, where even a second's delay can eliminate alpha.
For example, when AAPL trades on NASDAQ, a real-time data feed broadcasts the update almost instantly. To monitor these immediate fluctuations, analysts rely on specialized solutions. FMP's Stock Quote API provides up-to-the-minute stock quotes, changes, and volume data for individual stocks, giving portfolio managers and CIOs the essential data points to track stock performance and manage immediate portfolio risk.
Intraday data bridges the gap between high-frequency real-time feeds and broader historical summaries.
Intraday data captures short-term market moves—snapshots taken every minute, five minutes, or hour. It bridges the gap between tick-level and daily closing data. This time-series structure allows analysts to:
Intraday data balances granularity with manageability, offering enough resolution for detailed analysis without overwhelming data storage. For trend detection, financial analysts often apply technical indicators to this data. To smooth out the noise and identify underlying trends, you might calculate a technical indicator like a Simple Moving Average (SMA) over a 10-minute interval on intraday price points using the FMP Simple Moving Average API. This approach provides timely signals without the volatility of second-by-second updates.
Historical data provides the long-term perspective that helps analysts and executives measure performance and resilience.
Historical data compiles end-of-day or aggregated time-series data stretching months or years. While real-time and intraday focus on what is happening, historical data powers long-term modeling, performance benchmarking, and backtesting of strategies.
This dataset is crucial for fundamental analysis and strategic planning. For instance, to assess a company's capital efficiency and liquidity over the last year—a key concern for CFOs—a senior analyst would pull metrics like Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and the current ratio from an authoritative trailing twelve-month (TTM) dataset. FMP's Key Metrics TTM API allows for detailed retrieval of such critical performance indicators, enabling precise benchmarking against sector peers. While historical data looks backward, real-time and intraday keep your models grounded in the present.
Historical data looks backward to inform strategy, while real-time and intraday data keep your analysis grounded in current market activity.
Granularity defines how finely your data captures market activity. Choosing the correct time resolution is a strategic decision: too fine, and you drown in data; too coarse, and you miss an opportunity. Analysts must align granularity with their goal.
Once you know which dataset to use, the next question is how detailed it should be.
Table 3 — Data Granularity Levels and Typical Use Cases.
|
Granularity |
Interval Length |
Typical Usage |
Trade-off |
|
Tick |
Every transaction |
High-frequency trading |
Heavy storage load |
|
1-Second |
Per second |
Short-term signals |
Balanced speed/weight |
|
1-Minute |
Per minute |
Intraday charts |
Moderate detail |
|
Daily |
End of day |
Long-term analysis |
Low timeliness |
Selecting the right time resolution ensures balance between performance, cost, and actionable insight.
The most sophisticated quantitative models learn from the past while reacting to the present, requiring the seamless integration of different datasets. Integrating datasets is the foundation for dynamic trading dashboards and AI-driven forecasting.
A typical pseudo-workflow for a dynamic dashboard involves:
This layered approach allows the system to calculate long-term momentum signals from the historical baseline and execute micro-strategies based on the immediate real-time price action. This approach ensures your system captures both the long-term market context and short-term execution signals.
Every accurate model starts with clean, standardized data.
Raw market data is messy—cleaning it ensures reliable analysis. Data normalization involves standardizing formats and addressing errors to prevent analytical faults that can cascade into faulty insights and poor capital allocation.
Table 4 — Common Data Quality Issues and Fixes.
|
Issue |
Example |
Solution |
|
Missing values |
Missing price for a 5-minute interval |
Forward-fill or interpolate |
|
Duplicate timestamps |
Repeated entries at the same time |
Drop duplicates, retaining the last |
|
Outliers |
Price spike to $9999 |
Cap based on a z-score threshold |
|
Misaligned time zones |
NYSE vs. UTC timestamps |
Convert all to a consistent time zone (TZ) |
|
Corporate actions |
Stock split or dividend adjustment missing |
Adjust all affected prices and volumes |
Consistent, normalized data is non-negotiable for CFOs and quants focused on risk management and analytical integrity. Normalization also improves consistency across APIs and exchanges, reducing latency in downstream systems.
After cleaning and organizing data, the final step is matching dataset type to purpose.
No single dataset fits every purpose—the smartest analysts use all three in harmony. The choice depends entirely on the strategic goal, trading horizon, and required data resolution.
Table 5 — Dataset Selection by Analytical Goal.
|
Goal |
Recommended Dataset |
Reason |
|
Live alerts or trading |
Real-Time |
Immediate execution signals (milliseconds) |
|
Intraday strategy testing |
Intraday |
Intra-session resolution (minutes) |
|
Backtesting models |
Historical |
Long-term accuracy and stability |
|
Market research reports |
Historical + Intraday |
Blend context and recent timing |
No single dataset provides every answer, but used together, they form a comprehensive market intelligence framework.
The three main types are real-time (immediate, tick-level updates), intraday (snapshots taken at minute or hour intervals), and historical (end-of-day or longer time-series data).
Real-time data is continuous and delivered in milliseconds for live execution, while intraday data is aggregated into fixed-time buckets (e.g., 5-minute bars) and is used for short-term trend analysis.
Historical stock market data is primarily used for backtesting trading strategies, conducting long-term performance benchmarking, and performing in-depth fundamental research.
Yes, combining datasets is standard practice to create dynamic models that use historical data for a stable baseline and real-time data for immediate, responsive execution signals.
Historical data is best for backtesting as it provides a stable, multi-year record of market performance, free from the latency and volume of real-time or tick data.
Yes. Many providers, including FMP, deliver extended-session data so analysts can track trades before and after official market hours.
Introduction In the competitive landscape of modern business, companies that consistently outperform their peers ofte...
Introduction Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) has been working to diversify its supply chain, reducing dependence on China due to...
MicroStrategy Incorporated (NASDAQ:MSTR) is a prominent business intelligence company known for its software solutions a...