FMP
Aug 27, 2025 11:03 PM - amy Lyons
Image credit: Financial Modeling Prep (FMP)
A portfolio backtest is one of the most effective ways for analysts to test strategy durability before committing real capital. By simulating how a portfolio would have performed in the past, you can uncover strengths, weaknesses, and biases hidden in your investment thesis.
In this article, we'll walk through how to run a portfolio backtesting workflow using earnings surprises as the core input, complete with performance metrics and visualizations powered by FMP APIs.
Earnings surprises often trigger some of the most meaningful post-report market moves. A company that beats expectations can experience sustained upward drift, while a miss can lead to persistent underperformance.
Without a backtest portfolio performance analysis, it's easy to assume these effects are short-lived when in fact they may present systematic opportunities. Analysts who consistently run backtesting portfolio workflows can identify repeatable patterns and build conviction in their rebalancing rules.
To run a reliable test, you need structured data that captures both the event and the outcome — not messy, inconsistent inputs that will distort your results. Backtesting depends as much on the integrity of the underlying data as on the logic of the model itself. High-quality data ensures your workflows generate actionable insights rather than misleading noise.
FMP's APIs deliver rigorously maintained, institutional-grade data streams designed to eliminate inconsistencies, fill gaps, and capture the full market context. By relying on these datasets, analysts can trust that their portfolio backtesting workflows are grounded in accurate, decision-ready information.
Key endpoints for portfolio backtesting include:
With this foundation, analysts can focus on designing strategy rules that are replicable and stress-tested, knowing the data inputs are consistent and comprehensive.
The easiest way to prototype a backtesting strategy is through a lightweight workflow:
This approach gets you from idea to first results quickly. It's perfect for analysts testing hypotheses on the fly, validating whether signals deserve deeper investigation before committing to a full research framework.
When you want more rigor, a structured framework ensures repeatability and comparability:
This structured workflow transforms backtesting into a disciplined research process. Analysts can adjust parameters, rerun scenarios, and compare outcomes over time — giving them confidence in strategies that stand up under different conditions.
Imagine running a backtest on S&P 500 constituents over the past five years. Using the Earnings Surprises Bulk API, you classify companies into beaters, inlines, and missers. Then, applying a simple rule — overweight beaters for 10 trading days post-report — you compare performance to the index.
The result? Across multiple cycles, portfolios overweighting beaters outperformed the S&P 500 by an average of 1.2% over 10-day windows. While not every quarter delivered alpha, the consistency of the signal across sectors highlighted where rebalancing rules had the most impact. This kind of evidence gives analysts conviction that a pattern is systematic, not anecdotal.
Backtest results are most persuasive when they're visual. Analysts and CIOs alike rely on visualizations to compare performance across strategies and timeframes. With FMP data, you can build:
Whether you're using Python, Tableau, or Excel, these visuals turn raw numbers into narratives that support allocation decisions.
Even the most sophisticated backtests can mislead if not handled carefully. Keep these risks in mind:
Recognizing these pitfalls ensures your analysis remains realistic and decision-ready.
A portfolio backtest is only useful if it leads to better decisions. Use the quick start workflow when speed matters, and the full framework when rigor and repeatability are critical. The goal is to build a habit of testing, refining, and comparing — so that signals become strategies and not one-off anecdotes.
Your next step is simple: run a small experiment. Explore the Earnings Surprises Bulk API, the Full Chart API, and the Sector Performance Snapshot API to launch your first portfolio backtest. Then, iterate. Each run creates a reference point you can measure against, helping you build conviction in strategies that can scale from test to portfolio allocation.
And remember — the same framework can extend beyond earnings surprises. Guidance changes, insider trading activity, and sector-level shocks can all be tested using this approach, helping analysts apply disciplined research methods to a wide range of market events.
Portfolio backtesting is the process of simulating how an investment strategy would have performed historically using past data. It helps analysts evaluate the durability and reliability of their strategies before committing capital.
Earnings events often drive significant price movements. Backtesting around these events helps identify whether patterns of post-earnings drift are systematic and exploitable.
Accurate backtesting requires clean, consistent earnings data, historical prices, and market benchmarks. APIs like FMP's Earnings Surprises Bulk API and Full Chart API provide these inputs.
You can pull earnings surprises, retrieve historical prices, apply allocation rules in a spreadsheet, and compare results to a benchmark. This lightweight workflow allows for quick hypothesis testing.
Key risks include survivorship bias, overfitting, ignoring transaction costs, and using too short of a sample period. These can distort results and lead to false confidence.
A quick start helps validate ideas quickly, while the full framework emphasizes rigor, repeatability, and detailed performance metrics across multiple cycles.
Charts, heatmaps, and cumulative alpha curves turn raw results into clear narratives, making it easier to communicate findings to CIOs and stakeholders.
Yes. The same methods can be extended to other signals such as guidance changes, insider trading, or sector-wide macro shocks.
By simulating scenarios in advance, analysts can anticipate where strategies may underperform, allowing proactive adjustments and capital reallocation.
Using APIs and automated workflows ensures repeatability and scalability. This lets analysts run tests across larger universes and longer timeframes without being bogged down in manual work.
Are you curious about how professional investors decide whether a stock might be one of the best undervalued stocks to b...
Technical analysis is a fundamental approach used by traders to forecast price movements based on historical market data...
Introduction In the competitive landscape of modern business, companies that consistently outperform their peers ofte...